Two months ago, I had
a conversation with a fellow traveller who is Tangata Tiriti and who had
contested their party’s candidate selection for a General seat. I asked, “Is
the current system working for Pākehā in New Zealand?” They answered, “No.”
Well, it isn’t
working for Tangata Whenua either. So
why do so many of us still participate in it?
It’s not as if it’s the only game in town; we do all have other options,
and some of us are actively engaged in running those. But the fact remains that, until the current
system is transformed out of existence, we must participate in it in order to mitigate
against the worst excesses and atrocities that it sends our way.
That mitigation shows up in resistance to the activities of Orwellian
Ministries that disrupt whakapapa and uplift whenua. It manifests in pushback against the weakening
of human rights in favour of corporate rights.
It is seen in pursuit of legal rights that have been eroded by political
interference.
Sadly, it is rarely seen in those who stand for election,
and is even less evident amongst those who win.
Nevertheless, even with that history in mind, I cast my vote
for the 15th time in a general election. But this time I did so based
solely on experience augmented by information direct from the websites and
policy documents of the respective parties.
I did not read or watch any media reportage or commentary on the various
campaigns, and I made no comment of my own in that regard.
I voted on day one of the election, then did not give the
process any further thought or effort until 5.50pm on Thursday 19th
October when I tuned into the New Zealand Herald’s livestream.
The waiting journalists gathered in Parliament sounded like
clucking chooks, and someone must have realised it was not a good sound, because
after ten minutes they turned the audio off leaving us with surreal silent
video. Then Winston strode in a little
before 7pm to begin his delivery.
It was not until he uttered the word, “Labour”, that I realised
how much I had not wanted to hear the word, “National”. For, even though I know the history, I also
know that the increasing number of fragile people in this country could not
take another three years of governance under the most relentlessly venomous front
bench I have ever seen.
As my fellow traveller had confirmed, the system was not
working for any of us. But that deficiency
had been given additional venom by a government that had weaponised and
actively used it against us.
No comments:
Post a Comment