Tuesday, July 30, 2013

A CLOCKWORK CHOICE

“Is it better for a man to have chosen evil than to have good imposed upon him?” Anthony Burgess posed this question in his novel, A Clockwork Orange, which explored the free will of humans to choose between good and evil, and the cost of attempts to restrain that freedom.

There is a Clock Work Orange quality to the current wave of youth crime currently sweeping through Kaitāia where schools are regularly vandalized; and now set afire.  Small business owners are subject to robbery by organised gangs of youth, adept in diversion and counter surveillance.  And CCTV cameras have become pointless when all that is seen is the same generic hooded image. 

Mobile phone technology means thieves on the inside can be supported by lookouts on the outside, and mobs can be gathered and dispersed with a few thumb jabs.  In response, community patrols have been lauded, but how sustainable are they?  The law protects youth from the discipline of their own parents, so how likely is it that a group of strangers will have any effect?  The perpetrators are better organised, are in better shape, and are motivated to outlast any public relations effort.  Curfews have been suggested, and elsewhere in the country some communities are even instituting hoodie bans to counteract youth crime. 

Currently there are only two ways forward being proposed in Kaitāia: the use of force and / or a significant investment in social intervention. 

If the consensus is for force, then a bigger hammer will be needed in the shape of more laws, more Police, Court and Corrections staff, and bigger prisons. That’s not really tenable, but the likelihood of a sizable social investment in youth also seems untenable given that the welfare system is being gutted and no additional money for schools, health care, or recreation has been budgeted.  So unless Kaitāia comes up with its own sustainable strategies, someone with a dystopian agenda will eventually do it for us.

In the short to med-term Whānau Ora money, already promised, might be used to try and turn youth offenders and their whānau around.  Increased numbers of Māori Wardens might help police and defuse potential trouble. Shop owners and business people might hire locals, instead of another relative.  Local neighbourhood watch patrols and a reward system for information that leads to the arrest of criminals might be set up.

These are all worthwhile strategies in themselves, but they’re based on the view that changing our externals will change someone else’s internals.  From Cain to A Clockwork Orange proof abounds that such a view is wrong.  To paraphrase Ezra Taft Benson, “The world would take our youth out of the slums, but better we take the slums out of our youth, and then they take themselves out of the slums.”

Drive around Kaitāia and you’ll see large empty buildings matched by large groups of empty-eyed youth with lots of time and few options. Kaitāia too has few options, but it has even less time in which to choose.

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

THE NEW FRONTIER

When Kiwis took to their boats to refuse entry to the USS Buchanan in 1985, we saw the promise of a new age of independence and activism that gave hope to Māori and made a strong statement of sovereignty to all.  Today it is hard to fathom the extent to which that sovereignty has been bartered away to global corporate interests as a term of trade. 

After 9/11, the Clark led Labour government bought back into the corporate power circle by passing the Terrorism Suppression Act of 2002 and committing New Zealand defence forces to the US led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.  They then demonstrated their willingness to use force domestically under that Act by raiding Ngāi Tūhoe and other communities in October 2007. 

Although Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice’s visit to Auckland during the election year of 2008 didn’t save Labour, the Key led National government has been able to take full advantage of the deluge of American interest in New Zealand since then; and global corporates are the main beneficiaries. 
 
Like Clark, John Key has demonstrated a willingness to use force domestically in favour of global corporates, as seen in the deployment of the Navy and Police against Te Whānau-a-Apanui when they stopped Petrobras from fracking in their customary fisheries of the Raukumara Basin 

He has also shown his willingness to sell New Zealand sovereignty in exchange for trade concessions.  Within months of Hilary Clinton visiting New Zealand in April 2010 and signing The Wellington Declaration with foreign minister Murray McCully, Key brokered The Hobbit deal that changed employment laws and turned over more than $60m of taxpayer money to Warner Bros. 

18 months later, at the behest of the US entertainment industry and based on the illegal spying activities of the Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB), New Zealand resident Kim Dotcom was arrested.  As pointed out in last week’s Campbell Live feature, the new GCSB Bill extending that agency’s powers to spy on all New Zealanders and share information with foreign governments can be directly linked to The Wellington Declaration.

The cost of protecting global corporate interests will soon be felt in other facets of New Zealand life as well.  A February 2011 white paper: Pacific Partners – The Future of US – New Zealand Relations, details cooperation in manufacturing, medicine, mining and resources, as well as culture.  And the American Chamber of Commerce in New Zealand Inc, which maintains four offices in New Zealand, provides industry by industry updates on the growing US footprint in New Zealand.

Meanwhile, the 18th round of negotiations for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement will take place in Malaysia this week.  Once signed, all our international relationships and agreements will be subject to new laws that over-ride all sovereign protections, including Te Tiriti o Waitangi; again in favour of the global corporate interests. 

It seems the promise of 1985 is dead, the TPP will be Key’s legacy, and Kiwis are about to join Māori and Dotcom on a new frontier.

Tuesday, July 02, 2013

IRRELEVANT POLITICS

Thursday evening (27th June), I got a call from someone called Lea-Ann de Maxton to tell me that there was a meeting of the Crown’s Constitution Conversation Advisory Panel the next day (Friday 28th June) in Kaitāia and to ask who was going to be there from Te Runanga-ā-Iwi o Ngāti Kahu.  It was the first I’d heard of the meeting and I couldn’t be there.  A short time later an email arrived which said that, “a significant gathering” was taking place and asked me “kindly to extend this invitation and help to promote it.”  I forwarded it to the Trustees of Te Runanga-ā-Iwi o Ngāti Kahu who have emails.

On Saturday 29th June those same Trustees, along with their Kuia and Kaumātua, held their hui-a-marama and none of them had gone to the Constitutional Conversation meeting the day before.  I asked why and their answers included, “The meeting lacked notice, it’s a Crown timetable and agenda, it’s not based on He Whakaputanga o te Rangatiratanga o Ngā Hapū o Nu Tirani and Te Tiriti o Waitangi, it isn’t relevant, we have a longer, fuller Constitutional Transformation conversation, process and agenda going on.”
 
Clearly what was billed as “a significant gathering” actually wasn’t to a significant group of people. 

On that same day the Ikaroa-Rawhiti (east coast) byelection closed, and by that evening we knew Labour had won it with 42% (4,368 votes) of a 36% turnout (10,519 votes cast) out of 29,219 enrolled electors.  That meant at least 18,700 enrolled voters in Ikaroa Rawhiti didn’t vote.  Many thousands more weren’t even enrolled. 
 
Yesterday (Monday 1st July) Mike Smith asked on facebook, “Why was there such a low voter turnout in the east coast byelection?”  The answers from east coasters themselves came thick and fast.  “No petrol, no car, no time, no idea who to vote for, no abode, no idea where to go to vote, wasn't much hype, no tv, no phone, no post office, system is rigged, no link between voting and an improvement in our lives, the best candidates are stymied in their delivery even if they make it to parliament, the system stinks, we don’t feel heard, a depoliticised public, neo-liberalisation has killed democracy, government is illegal and is a corporation posing as a government, voting is a colonization idea, voting is voluntary, lost faith in MPs who talk crap, wasn’t a priority on my only day off, have seen and heard all the promises before, sick of the lack of unity between Māori MPs.” 

The glaringly obvious fact is that the Crown process of electing a government has no more relevancy for the majority of east coast Māori than the Crown Constitution Conversation has for the majority of Far North Māori. 

Māori disengagement from Crown processes is an old story.  But what is new, is the sustained Māori engagement in our own processes of constitutional transformation, and our increased understanding that politics is unnecessary and irrelevant to the process of good government.