We have a lot of evidence about the social impact of land loss on indigenous
peoples as the result of land seizures by their colonisers. In this country alone, there’s a plethora of
well-researched and reviewed reports of negative statistics for Māori in
health, housing, education, justice and employment. But there is hardly any similar research and
reportage of the economic losses involved.
In 2012, Te Rūnanga-ā-Iwi o Ngāti Kahu commissioned Dr Ganesh Nana, Kel
Sanderson and Adrian Slack of BERL Economics to assess the economic loss
suffered by Ngāti Kahu as a result of Crown actions or omissions up to 1865,
the loss having as its main cause the separation of Ngāti Kahu from our lands.
To quantify the prejudice
suffered as a consequence of those seizures, BERL used as their measure the
249,443.5 acres of Ngāti Kahu land seized by the Crown in the period up to
1865. The fundamental economic
components of their assessment were the loss of capital value, and the loss of
the flow of incomes from those lands since 1865.
This week we will look at the loss
of capital value to Ngāti Kahu of our lands by taking the actual level of the
recorded “consideration” the Crown paid for them over the period 1856 to 1865,
comparing those with the land values at that time, and then noting the difference
(shortfall) between the two.
Using information from the New Zealand Official Year Book, BERL
calculated the average value (in today’s dollars) of 100 acres of unimproved land
in the Mangōnui County at various dates in the past listed below.
1840: 100 acres sold for $12.93
1865: 100 acres sold for $15.31
1878: 100 acres sold for $17.81
1891: 100 acres sold for $21.58
Using
these figures, BERL was then able to assess that the total 249,443.5.5 acres
(100,944.8 hectares) of seized Ngāti Kahu lands would have been valued at £32,252
($64,504) in 1840, £ 35,936 ($71,872) in 1856, £ 38,189 ($76,378) in 1865, £
44,414 ($88,828) in 1878, and £ 53,825 ($107,650) in 1891.
Depending on the date of seizure,
BERL was then able to calculate the shortfall between the “consideration” paid
by the Crown and the calculated value of the land at the time of its seizure. The full details for each Ngāti Kahu land
block seized can be read on https://www.docdroid.net/XWkaxHo/06-august-2012-berl-report-for-ngati-kahu-on-economic-impact-of-crown-breaches-of-te-tiriti.pdf But, for the sake of space, I provide only the
global figures listed below.
|
|
Acres
|
“consideration” paid
|
Value at date of loss
|
Shortfall at date of land
loss
|
Value of shortfall
compounded to 1865
|
Total land loss between the period
pre-treaty to 1865
|
249,444
|
7,204
|
35,972
|
28,768
|
39,919
|
|
Total value of land loss compounded
to 1865
|
|
|
|
39,919
|
These show that there was a
significant loss of capital value imposed on Ngāti Kahu by the Crown.
Next week we will look at the loss
to Ngāti Kahu of the streams of income from the above lands for the period from
1865 until 2012.
No comments:
Post a Comment