[1] Prior to 1840, Iwi and Hapū were vibrant and
functional constitutional polities with the right, capacity and authority to
make politically binding decisions for the wellbeing of our people and the
protection of our lands.
That authority was exercised within
the construct and values of our own culture, and was part of a unique
constitutionalism that jealously guarded the independence of each polity, while
stressing the interdependence that is fundamental to whakapapa.
It included
the obligation to maintain the peace or make war, the right to define what we
would now call citizenship, and the authority to decide who could enter into
our jurisdiction as immigrants, what tikanga would govern their presence, and
what entitlements, if any, they might be granted.
In spite of
all that has happened in the last 176 years to the effective practice of that
constitutionalism, those who took part in the 252 hui held by Matike Mai Aotearoa (the
Independent Constitutional Working Group) between 2012 – 2015 are clear
that our right to it remains intact.
“I can’t see
how we could have existed without mana, meaning that we governed ourselves …
You just have to look at all of the things we did before Pākehā came to know
that. We made mistakes … but humans do
that everywhere … it doesn’t mean they’re not in charge of their own lives.”
“Of course
we governed ourselves. I’m Tūhoe and I know that no other Iwi had
the right or would even claim the right to make decisions for us … and because
we never signed the Treaty we never intended to let the Crown do what other Iwi
had never been able to do to us before 1840.”
“I don’t
know of any people who never governed themselves. Self-determination is just a reality which
our tūpuna lived every
day. It was real because they did it,
and they would literally fight to keep it.”
While
constitutionalism and government are often regarded as complex ideas, they are really
very simple. Government is the process we
choose to regulate our affairs, and a constitution is the code we use to
describe how government will function.
Constitutions
are based on “a
concept of power” and “a
site of power”. The concept of power
is the philosophy a society develops about what constitutional authority is,
and the values or interests that underpin it.
The site of power is the institution or place where a society decides
the authority may be exercised and the limits that might, or might not, be
placed upon it.
Every way of
governing, every concept and site of power, is based upon and gives expression
to the values of the people from which it comes, and which in turn it is designed to serve. Like the law of any society, a constitution is a cultural creation.
Next week we will briefly consider the Western concept and site of power.
[1] Third edited extract from pp. 30 – 31 of He Whakaaro Here Whakaumu Mō Aotearoa – The Report of Matike Mai Aotearoa – The Independent Working Group on Constitutional Transformation.
No comments:
Post a Comment