Before the conference, Lloyd
Pōpata, Te
Karaka Karaka (Hully Clarke), Bernard
Butler, Yvonne
Puriri and Margaret
Mutu had filed extensive briefs of evidence responding to the Crown’s and
the three iwi’s objections to the application, and demonstrating clearly that
Ngāti Kahu has mana
whenua at Hukatere, Te
Oneroa-ā-Tōhē, Kaimaumau,
Te
Make (Sweetwater), Tangonge,
Ōkahu
and Takahue.
The only way the Crown and the other iwi can combat the level of
knowledge of mana whenua Ngāti Kahu provided is to pretend it doesn’t exist. As
such their lawyers fought to have the Tribunal remove most of Ngāti Kahu’s
evidence from the record.
The Tribunal’s main concern is whether the Crown’s deeds will cause
significant and irreversible prejudice to Ngāti Kahu. Ngāti Kahu argued that
they will because they vest large areas of land in other iwi, ignoring that
they are Ngāti Kahu’s lands too. The other iwi’s lawyers argued that Ngāti Kahu
had plenty of opportunity to have a say but chose not to; so they and the Crown
decided how Ngāti Kahu’s interests would or would not be recognized. In fact,
as Ngāti Kahu pointed out, it did have its say and had repeatedly told the Crown
and its allies not to include Ngāti Kahu lands in their deeds. But they had
chosen to ignore Ngāti Kahu, which is why the application had been made.
During the conference the other iwi lawyers praised the Crown
repeatedly for doing a marvellous job in settling their clients’ claims and
fully supported all its attacks on Ngāti Kahu. They also said that their
clients are extremely grateful that the Crown is now allowing them to buy their
own land back off it. Te Aupōuri’s lawyers went as far as saying all the land
the Crown stole rightfully belongs to the Crown and that customary title has
all been extinguished. That essentially says they do not agree with the
Waitangi Tribunal’s finding that the Crown had not been able to prove it held
title to any of the lands and that the underlying native(/customary) title was
therefore not extinguished. As such all those lands still belong to the hapū
they were stolen from.
Ngāti Kahu did not get through everything in the Judicial Conference,
so its lawyers filed written responses last week. Now everyone is waiting for
the Tribunal’s decision on whether the application will go to hearing.
No comments:
Post a Comment