Although I wasn’t there, (had to keep a prior appointment), the Hikoi through town last Friday went off like clockwork I hear, thanks to the organizational efforts of those on the Noho Whenua as well as old hands like our Taitokerau Member of Parliament.
Thanks also to the many Pakeha who have either lived long enough amongst us to know the justice of our land claims, or are fair-minded enough to have acquainted yourselves with the facts. Having done so, you have supported our cause and not felt threatened by or resentful of the truth that this land should eventually be returned to Ngati Kahu. Thank you also to the workers on the station. Although you’re loyal and good employees of Landcorp, you’re also part of our community, and we’ve had korero kanohi ki te kanohi at a good and human level with you all.
Sadly that’s not been the case with the Office of Treaty Settlements Director (Paul James), Landcorp’s CEO (Chris Kelly), and Landcorp’s Board who are chaired by Jim Sutton, an ex-Labour MP, now a roving Ambassador for New Zealand. Sure they’ve been polite enough, but in the end they’ve all chosen to actively pursue or passively watch the carve-up and sale of our land. To do so they have had to first ignore and deny at an almost cellular level the truth that they are perpetrating and benefiting from an ongoing land theft. It genuinely puzzles me how and why the eight Directors on the Landcorp Board in particular can do that. They are all passionate landowners themselves. So I wonder, if their land was stolen as ours has been, when would they and their descendants stop seeking its return?
But orchestrating it all are the Crown Ministers behind the Office of Treaty Settlements and Landcorp. Trevor Mallard (Minister of State-Owned Enterprises), Michael Cullen (Minister of Finance), and Mark Burton (Minister of Treaty Negotiations) cannot show how they got their hands on our land. Yet, rather than do the honourable thing and work towards giving it back to us, they’ve all chosen to ape Pontius Pilate and Herod. Well wash away you Honourable members. It’s clear you’re here after every cent you can gouge out of our land, and I don’t doubt that you’ll be able to dodge justice a while longer. But how you’ll stand and defend your actions in the hereafter, I have no idea.
Hoha matou! We get tired of it sometimes, BUT we will carry on trying to get our ever-changing Treaty partner to do the right thing and follow its own rules.
And with that in mind, a final and emphatic thanks to Hone Harawira for the excellent questions in the House. Pai ana to mahi Hone hei reo mo tatou i te whare Ngarara. Rangatira o korero. Kua mau nga mahi a te Kawana. Koia e wetiweti nei ki nga Kereme nei.
Kia kaha tatou ma. Hei konei. Hei kona.
Tuesday, February 27, 2007
Sunday, February 18, 2007
THE WOVEN PEOPLE
Out at the noho whenua on Rangiputa last Saturday I heard a catch-cry I often hear that goes along the lines of, "We’re all the same." Whenever I hear stuff like that, I know straight away I'm listening to someone who's feeling different to me and really means, “I want you to be more like me"
To reword something written by C S Lewis: No man who says, we are all the same, believes it. He wouldn't say it if he did. The St. Bernard never says it to the toy dog, nor the scholar to the dunce, nor the employable to the bum, nor the pretty woman to the plain. The claim to sameness is made only by those who feel uncomfortable about others’ differences.
Take a look at the weaving in this picture. The korowai at the top is by the late Nicky Lawrence. The rain cape (pake) at the bottom is, I think, done by Jane Allan and Betsy Young of Ngataki. The silky, milky muka and the green putiputi are by Lydia Smith, while the whariki on which they lie were a joint effort by a number of us under Lydia's guidance. Although they are different in make, form and usage, these items are all woven on two universal principles – the horizontal weft and the vertical warp. Just like love' and 'marriage, you can't have one without the other. Well, you can try, but they’ll fall apart as sure as eggs.
Koutou ma – we don't have to be like each other. We don’t even have to like each other, although that would be nice. But we do have to live alongside each other. Why not do it as a woven people? Te whiringa o te muka tangata, ne? Hei konei. Hei kona.
To reword something written by C S Lewis: No man who says, we are all the same, believes it. He wouldn't say it if he did. The St. Bernard never says it to the toy dog, nor the scholar to the dunce, nor the employable to the bum, nor the pretty woman to the plain. The claim to sameness is made only by those who feel uncomfortable about others’ differences.
Take a look at the weaving in this picture. The korowai at the top is by the late Nicky Lawrence. The rain cape (pake) at the bottom is, I think, done by Jane Allan and Betsy Young of Ngataki. The silky, milky muka and the green putiputi are by Lydia Smith, while the whariki on which they lie were a joint effort by a number of us under Lydia's guidance. Although they are different in make, form and usage, these items are all woven on two universal principles – the horizontal weft and the vertical warp. Just like love' and 'marriage, you can't have one without the other. Well, you can try, but they’ll fall apart as sure as eggs.
Koutou ma – we don't have to be like each other. We don’t even have to like each other, although that would be nice. But we do have to live alongside each other. Why not do it as a woven people? Te whiringa o te muka tangata, ne? Hei konei. Hei kona.
Wednesday, February 14, 2007
RANGIPUTA REPOSSESSION
In the 1980s, under pressure from Maori, the government created 27B memorials on Crown lands under claim that were being transferred into the State Owned Enterprises (SOEs). For Ngati Kahu this included the Rangiputa station on the Karikari peninsula which is now being used by Landcorp. The idea was that the station would remain available to Ngati Kahu for inclusion in any eventual settlement. But because of the way the Crown has set it up, even though it got the land for nothing, it tries to assert that Ngati Kahu can only get it back if we buy it at market value using the cash portion of any settlement package we might accept.
Te Runanga-a-Iwi-o Ngati Kahu holds the mandate to negotiate this and all other historical claims of Ngati Kahu. In October last year the Office of Treaty Settlements let our negotiators know that Landcorp was going to carve off a small section of the station and put it on the open market with an asking price of $3.5 – $4 million. Now, given that the Crown had offered us no more than $8million cash to settle all our claims – you can bet we objected. Do the math yourself. If this small section of the station chews up 50% of the entire settlement cash being offered, we really don’t have much hope of getting the entire station back do we?
Still, we didn’t give up. We decided to find a capital venture partner who would provide us the money to negotiate a fair price with Landcorp in exchange for a long-term leaseback arrangement on the section which would allow him to recoup and grow his investment. That way Landcorp would get its cash, Ngati Kahu would hold ownership over of its land, the investor would get the use of it for an agreed term and, at the end of that term, usage would also come back to Ngati Kahu. The idea isn’t new. It’s been successfully done all over the world, including in Auckland where Ngati Whatua has an agreement over the Devonport Naval Base. It was a win-win for everyone. But nope – Landcorp wasn’t interested. Its CEO told our lawyer that the property would go on the open market in early 2007.
Our negotiators asked the Office of Treaty Settlements to purchase the section and hold it in the Landbank, which is another flawed but tried mechanism set up by the Crown to supposedly protect claim lands from being irrevocably alienated away before settlement. But nope – OTS didn’t have the money. Next the Urlich whanau of Te Whanau Moana, the local hapu out at Rangiputa, tried to engage the Crown and Landcorp in sincere dialogue. But no – they too were treated with disdain and fob-offs. Make no mistake. This land was stolen by the Crown. This is backed up by the Crown’s own Waitangi Tribunal which reported in 1997 that it was never sold. The Crown and its tentacles have made mega-bucks off it and continue to do so.
In last Thursday’s Age there was a glowing description of the land going up for sale. For Te Whanau Moana and Ngati Kahu that was the final straw. We have tried every possible avenue to resolve this. Been to the Tribunal, got a report that’s now ten years old, entered negotiations and offered innovative solutions. And what have we got out of it thus far? Nothing. So when you hear that there is an “occupation” out at Rangiputa, don’t you believe it. It’s just Te Whanau Moana repossessing a small part of its whenua.
Kia kaha koutou ma. E tautoko kaha ana Te Runanga-a-Iwi-o Ngati Kahu me nga tini hapu o Ngati Kahu i tenei mahi toa, mahi tika.
Te Runanga-a-Iwi-o Ngati Kahu holds the mandate to negotiate this and all other historical claims of Ngati Kahu. In October last year the Office of Treaty Settlements let our negotiators know that Landcorp was going to carve off a small section of the station and put it on the open market with an asking price of $3.5 – $4 million. Now, given that the Crown had offered us no more than $8million cash to settle all our claims – you can bet we objected. Do the math yourself. If this small section of the station chews up 50% of the entire settlement cash being offered, we really don’t have much hope of getting the entire station back do we?
Still, we didn’t give up. We decided to find a capital venture partner who would provide us the money to negotiate a fair price with Landcorp in exchange for a long-term leaseback arrangement on the section which would allow him to recoup and grow his investment. That way Landcorp would get its cash, Ngati Kahu would hold ownership over of its land, the investor would get the use of it for an agreed term and, at the end of that term, usage would also come back to Ngati Kahu. The idea isn’t new. It’s been successfully done all over the world, including in Auckland where Ngati Whatua has an agreement over the Devonport Naval Base. It was a win-win for everyone. But nope – Landcorp wasn’t interested. Its CEO told our lawyer that the property would go on the open market in early 2007.
Our negotiators asked the Office of Treaty Settlements to purchase the section and hold it in the Landbank, which is another flawed but tried mechanism set up by the Crown to supposedly protect claim lands from being irrevocably alienated away before settlement. But nope – OTS didn’t have the money. Next the Urlich whanau of Te Whanau Moana, the local hapu out at Rangiputa, tried to engage the Crown and Landcorp in sincere dialogue. But no – they too were treated with disdain and fob-offs. Make no mistake. This land was stolen by the Crown. This is backed up by the Crown’s own Waitangi Tribunal which reported in 1997 that it was never sold. The Crown and its tentacles have made mega-bucks off it and continue to do so.
In last Thursday’s Age there was a glowing description of the land going up for sale. For Te Whanau Moana and Ngati Kahu that was the final straw. We have tried every possible avenue to resolve this. Been to the Tribunal, got a report that’s now ten years old, entered negotiations and offered innovative solutions. And what have we got out of it thus far? Nothing. So when you hear that there is an “occupation” out at Rangiputa, don’t you believe it. It’s just Te Whanau Moana repossessing a small part of its whenua.
Kia kaha koutou ma. E tautoko kaha ana Te Runanga-a-Iwi-o Ngati Kahu me nga tini hapu o Ngati Kahu i tenei mahi toa, mahi tika.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)